← All research Research · Energy and materials · No. 16

The Electric Grid

The century-old machine everything now depends on: why demand is surging for the first time in decades, and why the wires can't keep up.

The grid is the largest machine ever built, and for the first time in a generation we are asking it to grow. After twenty flat years, electricity demand is surging while the machine that delivers it has a decade-long to-do list.

Chapters
9
Reading time
23 min
Updated
+25%US demand by 2030after two flat decades
~2,060 GWStuck in queuesdown 10% in 2025 from ~2,600 GW, still far above the existing US fleet
128 wksTransformer waitup from ~25 weeks in 2019
~12%Data centres by 2030of all US electricity

What this argues

  1. Demand growth is back+25% by 2030, the first real growth since the 1990s.
  2. The queue is the crisisAbout 2,060 GW of ready generation still can't get connected (down from a 2,600 GW peak).
  3. Hardware is scarceTransformers and turbines have multi-year waits.
  4. The fixes are knownReform, reconductoring, storage and flexible demand.
  5. Whoever solves power wins AIThe grid is now a strategic asset, not plumbing.
00

What has changed

Updated November 2026

4,269 bn kWhEIA 2026 US demand forecastafter a record 4,195 bn kWh in 2025 (Jul 2026)
~2,060 GWIn interconnection queuesend of 2025, down 10% year on year
45 monthsMedian request to agreementLBNL, 2025 data
128 wksPower transformer lead timeWood Mackenzie Q2 2025 survey
July 2026

US power demand is set for a second and third straight record

EIA's July 2026 Short-Term Energy Outlook (via Reuters, 7 July 2026) put US consumption at a record 4,195 billion kWh in 2025, rising to 4,269 billion kWh in 2026 and 4,399 billion kWh in 2027, led by data centres and electrification. Commercial demand is expected to exceed residential demand in 2026 for the first time on record. An earlier EIA outlook (February 2026) put baseline load growth at 1.9% in 2026 and 2.5% in 2027.

June 2026

The interconnection queue shrank, but only from a record

  • LBNL's Queued Up 2026 edition (June 2026) counted over 2,060 GW of generation and storage seeking connection at the end of 2025, a 10% fall from a year earlier.
  • High withdrawals and fewer new requests drove the fall; the third and fourth quarters of 2025 saw record withdrawal volumes (Interconnection.fyi, citing LBNL data).
  • Median time from request to signed interconnection agreement was 45 months in 2025, and from agreement to operation 31 months, up from 21 in 2008 (LBNL, June 2026).
June 2026

FERC moved from a proposal to show cause orders on large loads

After DOE asked FERC in October 2025 to standardise large-load (20 MW and up) interconnection, FERC on 18 June 2026 issued show cause orders to CAISO, ISO New England, MISO, NYISO, PJM and SPP, finding their rules appeared inadequate (Utility Dive, 2026). The orders cover study processes, cost shifts, co-location, flexible loads and alternative transmission technologies such as advanced conductors. FERC extended the response deadline to mid-November 2026 (Utility Dive, August 2026). States keep authority over retail sales and siting.

2026

Transformer waits remain above two years, with new factories coming

Wood Mackenzie's Q2 2025 survey, as reported by POWER Magazine in 2026, put average lead times at about 128 weeks for power transformers and 144 weeks for generator step-up units, with a roughly 30% supply deficit for power transformers in 2025. Announced North American factory investment reached nearly $1.8 billion by September 2025, including Hitachi Energy's $457 million Virginia plant (targeted for 2028) and Siemens Energy's $150 million North Carolina plant (production expected early 2027). Press reports in 2026 cite GSU waits above 160 weeks, but those come from secondary sources.

Not refreshed: data centre share of US electricity (2026-2030 estimates), utility capex (about $180B a year), the $2T+ grid investment estimate, the 2026 transformer lead-time survey, the ICF 2030 demand forecast, and asset-age and miles-of-line figures; no newer primary source was read for these.

Test yourself

The interconnection queue fell about 10% to roughly 2,060 GW. What is the best reading?

What did FERC's June 2026 show cause orders to six grid operators actually do?

01

What the Grid Is

The machine, briefly

The arc

A century of building, then a long pause

  1. Pearl Street: Edison lights lower Manhattan
  2. Rural power: the New Deal wires America
  3. Northeast blackout: interconnection's growing pains
  4. Deregulation: markets replace monopoly in half the US
  5. The strain: new demand meets old iron
The journey

From turbine to toaster, in four steps

  1. Generate: plants and farms make power at scale.
  2. Transmit: high-voltage lines move it across states.
  3. Distribute: local wires step it down to neighbourhoods.
  4. Balance: operators match supply to demand every second.
The voltage journey

Power steps down all the way to your wall

  1. ~20 kV at the plant (the power plant)
  2. 230-765 kV highways
  3. stepped to ~13 kV
  4. the local feeders
  5. 120/240 V (your outlet)
Two architectures

The grid is evolving from one-way to many-way

Yesterday: hub and spokeTomorrow: mesh
Flowbig plants push power outwardsolar, batteries and EVs flow both ways
The machine

America's grid, by the numbers

~700kMiles of transmissionthe high-voltage backbone
5.5MMiles of distributionthe local last miles
~3,000Utilitiesa fragmented patchwork
40+ yrsAverage asset agemuch past design life
70%Of US transmission lines are past the halfway point of their design life

The grid was largely built in two bursts, the 1960s-70s and the 1990s. The bill for that aging arrives at exactly the moment demand growth returns.

Test yourself

Why does a transformer shortage hurt the whole grid rather than one niche?

Which everyday grid problem flows most directly from electricity being made and used in the same instant?

02

The Demand Shock

Growth returns after 20 flat years

The inflection

US demand was flat for two decades, now it's climbing

US electricity demand, 2005-2030 (forecast)
View the data
US
20053800
20103850
20153900
20203850
20234050
20264270
20305000

Source: EIA history; EIA STEO Jul 2026 (2026 forecast); ICF forecast (2025) for 2030 · values read from the chart, approximate

The chart marks two flat decades, then +25% by 2030. Values are read approximately from the axis; the 2026 point is EIA's July 2026 forecast of 4,269 billion kWh (2025 was a record 4,195 billion kWh).

The driver

Data centres alone could take ~12% of US power by 2030

Data centres' share of US electricity %
View the data
US
20234.4
2026e7
2028e9.5
2030e12

Source: LBNL; EPRI (2024-25)

The stack of new demand

It isn't only AI

Source of demandWhat it adds
Data centres & AIthe loudest and lumpiest new load
EVsevery ten million EVs = another 1-2% of demand
Heat pumpselectrifying heating shifts winter peaks
Reshored factorieschips, batteries and steel are power-hungry
Hydrogen & fuelselectrolysis, if it scales, is enormous
Air conditioninga warming world runs the compressor harder
Scale check

What one AI campus asks of the grid

1 GWOne campusa nuclear reactor's output
~750kHomes' worthof equivalent demand
24/7Load shapeflat, relentless, no off-peak
2 yrsWanted byvs 10+ years for new lines

For twenty years the grid's problem was too little growth. Overnight, the problem became too much. An industry staffed, financed and regulated for stagnation is being asked to sprint.

Test yourself

Why was US electricity demand flat from 2005 to 2020 even as the economy grew?

Using the chapter's rule of thumb, roughly how much extra demand would 30 million EVs add?

03

The Bottlenecks

Where it all jams

The queue

2,000+ GW of projects are still waiting to connect

Generation and storage capacity in US interconnection queues (GW; last bar is end-2025, approx 2,060) GW
View the data
US
2015300
2018600
20211400
20232000
20252600
End-20252060

Source: LBNL interconnection data (2025); LBNL Queued Up 2026 edition (Jun 2026) · values read from the chart, approximate

The hardware wall

Transformer lead times quintupled

Transformer lead time weeks
View the data
US
201925
202150
2023100
2025128

Source: Wood Mackenzie; industry surveys (2025)

The full stack of delay

Each layer adds years

LayerDelay
Hardwaretransformers 2-3 yrs; turbines similar
Interconnection~45 months median from request to signed agreement (LBNL, 2026)
Permittinglines can take 10-15 years end to end
Politicsevery mile crosses someone's backyard
10-15 yearsTypical time to build a major new transmission line

Against data centres that want power in two years and factories in three. The mismatch between demand's clock and the grid's clock is the single most important number in American energy.

Why the queue jams

The mechanics of interconnection gridlock

MechanismWhat happens
Study cascadeseach project's study depends on every other project's fate
Speculative entriesdevelopers file placeholders; most never get built
Serial processingone-at-a-time reviews from a first-come era
Cost-allocation fightswho pays for upgrades stalls everything
Staff shortagestoo few engineers to run the studies
Withdrawal chainsone dropout forces everyone's restudy

Test yourself

Transformer lead times went from about 25 weeks in 2019 to 128 weeks in 2025. What does that mean?

Why does the interconnection queue jam even when the engineering is simple?

04

The Money

The build-out bill

The bill

What fixing and growing the grid costs

$2T+By 2040estimated US grid investment need
~$180BPer year nowutility capex, rising fast
77%+Transformer pricessince 2019
Rate hikesWho paysbills are the funding source
Who profits

The grid build-out's winners and payers

The winnersThe payers
1Equipment makers: transformers, cables, switchgearRatepayers: bills fund the build-out
2Utilities: bigger rate base, regulated returnsBig load: data centres pay to jump queues
3Grid tech: software squeezing more from wiresTaxpayers: subsidies and guarantees
4Storage: batteries as grid infrastructureLate arrivals: projects priced out by delay
$2T+Estimated US grid investment needed by 2040

Transmission, distribution, transformers and storage: the third great electrification build. For scale: that approaches the inflation-adjusted cost of the entire Interstate Highway System, twice.

The money

The utility doom loop, the risk regulators fear

  1. Bills rise
  2. Rich customers defect to solar
  3. Fewer payers left
  4. Fixed costs concentrate
  5. Bills rise faster (the loop repeats: the death spiral)

Electricity used to be boring infrastructure. It is now the binding constraint on the two biggest builds of the era, AI and the energy transition. That promotion, from plumbing to strategic asset, is the grid's whole story this decade.

Test yourself

Why is the build-out described as structurally good for regulated utilities?

In the utility doom loop, what happens after bills rise?

05

The Fixes

Known, proven, and slow

The toolkit

Six ways to unjam the grid

FixWhat it does
Queue reformfirst-ready-first-served instead of first-come
Reconductoringadvanced wires double capacity on existing towers
Grid-enhancing techsensors and software unlock hidden headroom
Storage as wiresbatteries defer new lines by shaving peaks
Flexible demanddata centres and EVs that bend around scarcity
Behind-the-metergeneration built where the load is, skipping queues
Storage as wires

How a battery substitutes for a transmission line

  1. Find the pinch: a corridor that congests a few hundred hours a year.
  2. Site batteries: at each end of the constrained line.
  3. Shift the peak: charge off-peak, discharge through congestion.
  4. Defer the build: the $1B line waits a decade, or forever.
Two grids in one country

Regulated states versus market states

Regulated (the South, West)Markets (Texas, PJM, etc.)
Modelone utility owns it allcompetition sets prices
Buildfaster, one deciderprice signals drive it
Riskratepayers hold itinvestors hold it
AI dealsbilateral, behind closed doorspriced in the open
The pragmatic path

What the next five years actually look like

  • Big load routes around. AI campuses co-locate with plants or build their own power.
  • Batteries flood in. Storage is the fastest-permitted asset on the grid.
  • Reconductoring spreads. The quiet doubling of existing corridors.
  • Reform grinds forward. FERC and states inch queues toward sanity.

Test yourself

According to the chapter, why do cheap fixes wait behind expensive ones?

Why do batteries fit a corridor that congests only a few hundred hours a year?

06

Risks & Politics

The honest chapter

Both sides, fairly

Build-out boom or ratepayer revolt?

The boom caseThe revolt case
1Demand is real. AI and factories are signed contractsBills rise. Ratepayers fund data-centre growth
2Capital is ready. Utilities and funds want to buildSiting fights. Every line breeds lawsuits
3Tech headroom. Cheap fixes still unexploitedPolitical whiplash. Policy reverses by administration
4Bipartisan need. Reliability polls well everywhereForecast risk. Overbuild if AI demand disappoints
The risk register

Six risks a serious observer tracks

RiskDescription
Reliabilityextreme weather against an aging fleet
Cyber & physicalthe grid is the top-tier infrastructure target
Cost overrunsmegaprojects rarely land on budget
Demand whiplashAI slowdown stranding new capacity
Workforcelinemen and engineers retiring faster than hiring
Fragmentation3,000 utilities, no single pilot at the wheel
$130 billionThe cost of Texas's February 2021 grid failure, in one week246 deaths and the costliest disaster in state history, from four days of cold the system wasn't built for

Resilience looks expensive until you price its absence.

Test yourself

What is the main lesson of the Texas February 2021 failure in this chapter?

What is the demand whiplash risk?

07

What to Watch

Signposts, not predictions

The dashboard

Four dials worth watching

Queue monthsConnection timethe core constraint
Lead timesTransformershardware health check
GW energisedReal additionstalk versus wires
Rate casesBill politicswho pays, who revolts
Key takeaways

Five signposts for the next 24 months

  1. Do queues start shrinking? Reform's first measurable win.
  2. Do transformer waits peak? New factories vs surging demand.
  3. Does big load go behind-the-meter? The workaround becoming the norm.
  4. Does a state pioneer AI tariffs? The template others will copy.
  5. Does a major outage reset politics? One bad week changes everything.

Test yourself

Which is the stronger signal that the grid is improving?

Why does the chapter tell readers to watch rate cases?

08

Reference

Glossary & sources

Reference

Plain-language glossary

TermMeaning
Transmissionhigh-voltage highways moving power long distances
Distributionlocal streets delivering power to buildings
Interconnection queuethe waiting list to plug into the grid
Transformerthe device that steps voltage up or down
Peak demandthe single highest moment of consumption
Reconductoringrestringing old towers with higher-capacity wire
Behind-the-meterpower made and used on-site, skipping the grid
Rate basethe assets a utility earns regulated returns on

The 20th century's grid was built for a nation of consumers. The 21st century's must serve a nation of computers, factories and batteries, all at once. Same wires, new civilisation. That is the engineering brief of the next two decades.

Every technology of the decade (the model, the robot, the EV, the factory) ends its supply chain at the same place: a transformer that takes three years to arrive. The grid is where the future queues.

Key takeaways

The five conclusions to take away

  1. Demand growth is structural: five megatrends, one set of wires.
  2. Process, not physics, is the constraint: queues and permits set the pace.
  3. Hardware scarcity is real: transformers are the new GPUs.
  4. The money flows to the build: utilities and equipment makers feast.
  5. Power is strategy now: energy access decides where the future gets built.
Reference

Sources & Further Reading

  • LBNL: 'Queued Up' interconnection data; data-centre demand study (2024-25).
  • Wood Mackenzie: transformer supply-deficit analysis (2025).
  • EPRI: data-centre load forecasts to 2030.
  • ICF: US electricity demand growth outlook (2025).
  • DOE: National Transmission Needs Study; grid reports.
  • S&P Global: data-centre power demand tracking (2025).
  • Utility filings: capital plans and rate cases (2025-26).
  • Figures marked 'estimate' are compilations.

Test yourself

What does calling transformers 'the new GPUs' suggest?

Which description of 'rate base' is correct?

Sources cited

ICF · LBNL · Wood Mackenzie · EPRI · EIA · DOE · S&P Global · Industry data and disclosures · Utility filings · EIA STEO, Jul 2026 (via Reuters) · LBNL Queued Up 2026 edition, Jun 2026 · Interconnection.fyi, 2026 · Utility Dive, 2026 (FERC show cause orders) · POWER Magazine, 2026 (Wood Mackenzie transformer data) · pv magazine USA, May 2026

Keep reading

Research, not investment advice. Figures as of , from the sources cited.

Legal information and disclosures

These are my own views as of the update shown on this page. They can change without notice, and I have no duty to update them. Past performance does not indicate future results, and any investment can lose money.

This is for education only. It is not investment, legal, tax, medical or accounting advice, and it is not an offer to sell or a solicitation to buy any security in any jurisdiction. It does not consider your goals or circumstances.

Figures from company filings, public agencies and other third parties are believed to be reliable, but I have not independently verified them and cannot guarantee them. Forecasts and anything marked as an estimate rest on assumptions that may prove wrong.

Please do not copy or republish this material without my written consent.