Critical Minerals
The raw materials of the electric age: what they are, why demand is exploding, and how one country came to refine most of them.
The old economy ran on hydrocarbons. The new one runs on lithium, copper and rare earths, and the map of power is being redrawn accordingly. Energy security used to mean oil tankers; increasingly it means refineries, magnets and mines.
What this argues
- Demand is structural, not cyclicalElectrification multiplies mineral intensity.
- Refining is the real chokepointChina processes most minerals it doesn't mine.
- Copper is the quiet crisisThe hardest gap to close, in everything.
- Prices whipsaw, direction holdsThe lithium crash changed nothing structural.
- The West is responding lateReshoring takes a decade; the gap is now.
What has changed
Updated November 2026
Copper hit records and the supply squeeze tightened
- Mining Reporters (11 Aug 2026): Comex copper touched $6.7005/lb, 0.4 cents under the $6.7045/lb record set on 5 Aug; LME three-month copper was about $14,195.50/t. Copper was up nearly 18% in 2026 and had roughly doubled over 12 months.
- The Gresik smelter that processes Grasberg ore was suspended after a boiler leak on 8 Aug; Grasberg itself is still recovering from the September 2025 mudslide and is not targeted to reach full production until end-2027.
- LME copper warehouse stocks fell 4,675 t to 218,300 t.
The IEA's 2026 outlook says concentration and weak investment are the risk
- The IEA released its Global Critical Minerals Outlook 2026 on 16 July 2026, headlined: supply concentration, export restrictions and declining investment put critical mineral security at risk.
- IEA reported that prices rebounded in 2025 and early 2026 after years of decline, investment fell 9% in 2025, and refining concentration rose for most minerals (via press coverage of the report).
- As summarised by Skillings Mining (18 Jul 2026, not verified against the IEA text): lithium demand growth to 2040 of eightfold, a copper structural deficit of about 25% through 2035, and $6.5 trillion of downstream output at risk by 2030 from expanded Chinese controls on gallium, germanium and graphite.
China's expanded rare-earth controls are paused, not scrapped
- After the Trump-Xi meeting in South Korea, China suspended its 9 Oct 2025 expansion of rare-earth export controls for one year, to 10 Nov 2026 (Mining.com and Mining Technology, 27 Apr 2026).
- The April 2025 licensing regime for seven medium and heavy rare earths (samarium, gadolinium, terbium, dysprosium, lutetium, scandium, yttrium) and related magnets stays in force (Mining Technology, 27 Apr 2026).
- GlobalData (2025 figures): China produced 270 kt of about 390 kt REO-equivalent mined (69.2%) and processes up to 90% of rare earths. No confirmed extension beyond 10 Nov 2026 was found.
Lithium rebounded sharply in 2026 before easing
Reported futures data (Reuters via secondary outlets): the most active Guangzhou lithium carbonate contract closed near 104,740 yuan/t on 12 Oct 2026, about half the 209,880 yuan peak of 13 May 2026, yet above year-earlier levels. The 80% crash of 2022-2025 has therefore been partly reversed, which does not change the structural argument about supply timelines.
Washington moved to stockpiling and price support
Project Vault, a roughly $12 billion US strategic critical-minerals reserve (about $10 billion EXIM financing plus about $2 billion private capital, per law-firm analyses), was announced in early February 2026. Separately, the Pentagon's equity stake in MP Materials is reported to include a $110/kg NdPr price floor. Commerce's Section 232 critical-minerals review found heavy reliance on imported processed minerals threatens national security (reported conclusion 24 Oct 2025); reports say broader price-floor plans may be scaled back.
Not refreshed: current refining-share percentages (kept at 2025 values), EU Critical Raw Materials Act progress, battery gigafactory count, ore-grade and recycling figures, 2030-2035 copper supply-demand chart values, and the late-October 2026 lithium and copper spot prices.
What They Are
The periodic table of power
How to read this deck
- Minerals are the transition's fuel. Every EV, panel and data centre starts as rock.
- Mining is not refining. The geology is spread worldwide; the processing is not. That gap is the story.
- Every number is sourced. Demand curves and shares from the IEA and USGS, dated.
- Prices deceive. Boom-bust cycles hide the structural squeeze underneath.
The minerals squeeze, in four numbers
Source: IEA Global Critical Minerals Outlook 2025.
Six minerals that run the modern world
| Item | Description |
|---|---|
| Lithium | The irreplaceable heart of every EV and grid battery. |
| Copper | The metal of electrification: wires, motors, grids. |
| Rare earths | Tiny magnets in every motor, turbine and missile. |
| Nickel & cobalt | Battery cathodes: energy density in metal form. |
| Graphite | Every lithium battery's anode; four-fifths from China. |
| Silicon & polysilicon | The substrate of chips and solar alike. |
A critical mineral is not a rare one. It is a mineral the economy cannot pause without, supplied through a door one hand can close.
Criticality = importance x concentration. Neither alone earns the name.
From rock to product, in four stages
- Ore is extracted: years of permits, decades of capex.
- Raw ore becomes battery- or magnet-grade material.
- Materials become cathodes, magnets, components.
- Components become EVs, turbines, electronics.
Clean tech is materials-hungry
Source: IEA (2025).
Demand that doubles in five years is being served by supply that takes fifteen to respond: the structural mismatch behind every price spike.
Supply risk versus economic importance
A quadrant map of supply risk (vertical) against economic importance (horizontal), with quadrants labelled Niche worries, The danger zone, Comfortable and Watch closely. Rare earths, graphite, cobalt and lithium sit in the danger zone (top right), with rare earths and graphite highest on supply risk. Nickel sits near the midline and copper sits far right but lower on supply risk. Aluminium sits lower right, in the watch-closely quadrant.
Source: analysis after EU/US criticality frameworks.
Minerals became weapons in slow motion
- First shot: China halts rare earths to Japan.
- IRA: America subsidises its own chain.
- Gallium & germanium: China restricts chip metals.
- Graphite controls: battery anodes join the list.
- Rare-earth squeeze: automakers face stoppages; Oct 2025 expansion paused to 10 Nov 2026.
Source: Public records.
The Demand Wave
Electrification, quantified
Demand growth to 2040, mineral by mineral
View the data
| Demand multiple | |
|---|---|
| Lithium | 5 |
| Graphite | 2 |
| Nickel | 2 |
| Cobalt | 1.5 |
| Copper (+30%) | 1.3 |
Source: IEA Global Critical Minerals Outlook 2025 (STEPS scenario)
What's pulling the minerals
| Item | Description |
|---|---|
| EVs | Over half of incremental lithium demand; batteries scale with fleets. |
| Grid storage | The fastest-growing battery market after vehicles. |
| The grid itself | Millions of miles of new copper wire. |
| Data centres | AI's build-out is copper- and power-hungry. |
| Defence | Rare-earth magnets in everything that flies or guides. |
| Electronics | The baseline demand that never went away. |
Lithium's boom-bust hides the structural story
A line chart of a lithium price index (2020 = 100) from 2020 to 2025: the price rises to an 8x spike in 2022, then falls more than 80% by 2024-2025. Prices then rebounded in 2026 (see What has changed).
Source: Industry price indices (2020-25).
The lithium crash didn't cancel the shortage: it caused the next one, by starving the mines that 2030 will need.
Low prices today cancel projects that take a decade to build. The bust plants the seeds of the boom.
Each needs a supply chain of lithium, nickel, graphite and copper locked years in advance. The factories are the easy half; the feedstock contracts behind them are where the real competition happens.
The China Grip
The refining monopoly
China's share of refining, mineral by mineral
View the data
| China | |
|---|---|
| Rare-earth magnets | 92 |
| Refined rare earths | 91 |
| Battery graphite | 80 |
| Refined cobalt | 70 |
| Refined lithium | 60 |
| Refined copper | 50 |
Source: IEA; industry estimates (2025)
How replaceable is Chinese supply?
| Position (easily replaced to locked in) | Note |
|---|---|
| Raw lithium | Australia & Chile mine plenty |
| Refined lithium | Capacity exists, scaling |
| Battery graphite | Four-fifths Chinese |
| Refined rare earths | Near-monopoly |
| RE magnets | 92%: the deep lock |
Every EV motor, wind turbine and precision missile needs them. When Beijing restricted exports in 2025 (the October expansion is paused until 10 November 2026), automakers faced production halts within weeks: a live demonstration of what leverage means.
The two-decade playbook
- Tolerate the mess. Refining is dirty; China accepted the environmental cost others outsourced.
- Subsidise the scale. Cheap credit and power made Chinese processing unbeatable.
- Price out rivals. Zero-fee smelting today buys monopoly tomorrow.
- Integrate downstream. Refining fed batteries fed EVs: the whole chain, in-house.
Mineral dominance is embargo leverage without the drama
| China's position | The world's exposure | |
|---|---|---|
| Export controls / Automakers | Gallium, germanium, graphite: used | Weeks of magnet inventory |
| Price power / Defence | Output swings set world prices | Rare earths in every system |
| Downstream lock / Energy transition | Batteries and EVs inherit the edge | Batteries need Chinese graphite |
| Negotiating chip / No quick fix | In every trade dispute | Alternatives take 5-10 years |
Mines & Money
Why supply is so slow
Why so few discoveries become mines
| Stage | Description |
|---|---|
| Explored deposits | Thousands mapped, most never developed |
| Permitted projects | Approved, seeking billions |
| Financed projects | Capital committed, construction underway |
| Producing mines | The survivors, decades after discovery |
What a new mine takes
Source: Industry data; IEA (2025).
Who is trying to break the concentration
| Item | Description |
|---|---|
| Australia | Lithium mining giant, moving into refining. |
| Chile & Argentina | The lithium triangle courts capital. |
| Indonesia | Nickel powerhouse via Chinese investment, a twist. |
| Africa | Cobalt, lithium, rare earths: the contested frontier. |
| North America | IRA-fuelled mines and refineries, slowly. |
| Recyclers | Urban mining: batteries as future ore. |
The Copper Problem
The metal with no substitute
Everything in the electric age (every wire, motor, grid and data centre) needs copper. And copper is quietly running short.
Lithium gets the headlines; copper carries the current. Its gap is the harder one to close.
Copper demand pulls away from mine supply
View the data
| Demand | Mine supply | |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 26 | 26 |
| 2030e | 29 | 26 |
| 2035e | 33 | 23 |
Source: IEA; industry projections (2025)
Copper's structural squeeze
Source: USGS; IEA (2025).
Every megatrend pulls the same metal
| Item | Description |
|---|---|
| The grid | Wires, transformers, substations: the biggest single pull. |
| EVs | ~80 kg per car, 4x a petrol vehicle. |
| Data centres | Power distribution and cooling, at AI scale. |
| Renewables | Solar farms and especially offshore wind. |
| Construction | The old demand that never left. |
| Defence & industry | Everything electric, everywhere. |
If lithium is the transition's headline, copper is its bloodstream: invisible, everywhere, and much harder to replace.
Chemistries can route around cobalt or nickel. Nothing routes around conductivity.
Risks & Responses
The honest chapter
Crisis narrative versus market faith
| The crisis case | The market case | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Concentration: one country, most refining | Prices work: spikes summon supply, eventually |
| 2 | Timelines: supply can't chase demand | Innovation: chemistries shift around scarcity |
| 3 | Copper: a genuine geological squeeze | Recycling: the ore pile grows every year |
| 4 | Weaponisation: already demonstrated | Demand flex: substitution and efficiency respond |
Six risks a serious observer tracks
| Item | Description |
|---|---|
| Export weaponisation | Rare-earth-style controls spreading to other minerals. |
| Copper deficit | The one gap that touches everything. |
| Project slaughter | Low prices killing the 2030s' supply today. |
| Resource nationalism | Producer countries rewriting terms mid-game. |
| ESG collisions | Mines the transition needs, communities reject. |
| Chokepoint chemistry | Refining know-how harder to copy than assumed. |
What the West is actually doing
- Subsidise. IRA credits and EU acts pull mines and refineries onshore.
- Stockpile. Strategic reserves for magnets and battery metals.
- Diversify. Friend-shoring deals across Australia, Africa, the Americas.
- Substitute & recycle. Sodium batteries, magnet-free motors, urban mining.
What the West has put on the table
Source: US IRA; EU Critical Raw Materials Act.
What to Watch
Signposts, not predictions
Four dials worth watching
Five signposts for the next 24 months
- Does China escalate export controls? Each round accelerates the West's response.
- Do copper projects get funded? FIDs now decide the 2035 balance.
- Does ex-China refining scale? The only structural fix that matters.
- Do new chemistries dent demand? Sodium and LFP shift the lithium curve.
- Does recycling industrialise? Urban mining moving from pilot to plant.
The five conclusions to take away
- A materials dependency replaces a fuel one: the trade is good; the transition is exposed.
- Refining beats mining: control of chemistry outranks control of rock.
- Copper is the master constraint: watch it above everything.
- Cycles mask structure: price crashes fund tomorrow's shortages.
- The 2020s are the gap years: insurance is being bought for a decade away.
Reference
Glossary & sources
Plain-language glossary
| Term | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Critical mineral | Essential to the economy, risky in supply. |
| Refining | Turning ore into usable, high-purity material. |
| Ore grade | How much metal each tonne of rock contains. |
| Friend-shoring | Sourcing from allies rather than rivals. |
| Rare earths | 17 elements behind powerful permanent magnets. |
| Cathode / anode | A battery's two sides: nickel/cobalt and graphite. |
| FID | Final investment decision: a project's real green light. |
| Urban mining | Recycling products as a source of metals. |
The 20th century fought over the fuels that moved machines. The 21st is quietly contesting the materials machines are made of, and the winning move happened in refineries, twenty years before anyone was watching.
Sources & further reading
- IEA, Global Critical Minerals Outlook 2025.
- J.P. Morgan Research, lithium and battery-metal demand outlook (2025-26).
- USGS, Mineral Commodity Summaries.
- Industry price indices, lithium carbonate, copper (2020-25).
- Company disclosures, miners' capex and project timelines.
- Government policy: IRA, EU Critical Raw Materials Act, export-control filings.
- Figures marked 'estimate' or 'scenario' are compilations of the above.
Sources cited
IEA · USGS · J.P. Morgan Research · US IRA · EU Critical Raw Materials Act · Industry price indices · Company disclosures · Public records · IEA, Global Critical Minerals Outlook 2026 (16 Jul 2026) · Skillings Mining, 18 Jul 2026 · Mining Reporters, 11 Aug 2026 · Mining Technology, 27 Apr 2026 · Mining.com, Oct 2025 · GlobalData, 2025 rare-earth output · Mayer Brown, Project Vault, Mar 2026 · Reuters via secondary outlets, Oct 2026
Keep reading
Research, not investment advice. Figures as of , from the sources cited.
Legal information and disclosures
These are my own views as of the update shown on this page. They can change without notice, and I have no duty to update them. Past performance does not indicate future results, and any investment can lose money.
This is for education only. It is not investment, legal, tax, medical or accounting advice, and it is not an offer to sell or a solicitation to buy any security in any jurisdiction. It does not consider your goals or circumstances.
Figures from company filings, public agencies and other third parties are believed to be reliable, but I have not independently verified them and cannot guarantee them. Forecasts and anything marked as an estimate rest on assumptions that may prove wrong.
Please do not copy or republish this material without my written consent.