← All research Research · Technology and AI · No. 10

Humanoid Robotics

Why a general-purpose robot is suddenly plausible, what it will cost, who is building it, and why China may already have won the supply chain.

A humanoid robot is a bet that the cheapest way to automate a world built for humans is to build a machine shaped like one. The West leads the AI that gives robots a brain, while China already dominates the body: the motors, joints and supply chain that make up most of the cost.

Chapters
9
Reading time
24 min
Updated
$38BMarket by 2035Goldman Sachs (1.4M shipments)
$20-30kTarget costTesla's price for Optimus at scale
63%Componentsof the supply chain is Chinese
~13,000Shipped in 2025almost all of them by China

What this argues

  1. The 'brain' is nearly solvedAI can now perceive and plan; the hard part is the body.
  2. Cost is the whole battleA useful humanoid must cost like a car, not a supercar.
  3. Actuators are the moatThe motors and joints are ~55% of cost, and China owns them.
  4. China is running its EV playbookVertical supply chain, brutal cost, state backing, again.
  5. Factory first, home lastStructured work comes years before your kitchen.
00

What has changed

Updated November 2026

CNY 150.8Unitree IPO priceper share, Aug 2026 (Yicai)
+460%First-day closeCNY 845, 19 Aug 2026
CNY 341.7BMarket cap at closeabout $50.7B (Yicai)
CNY 6.1BRaised in the IPOabout $900M (TNW)
August 2026

Unitree listed on Shanghai's STAR Market and surged

Unitree priced its IPO at CNY 150.8 per share, raising about CNY 6.1B (roughly $900M) for about a tenth of the enlarged company, at a pricing valuation near CNY 61B (about $9B). Retail demand was reported at more than 8,000 times the shares on offer. On its 19 August 2026 debut the stock rose as much as 629% intraday and closed at CNY 845, up 460%, for a market value of CNY 341.7B (about $50.7B). Sources: Yicai Global, 19 Aug 2026; The Next Web, Aug 2026.

March to August 2026

Unitree's profile is now on public record

  • Unitree filed for the STAR Market listing on 20 March 2026 and received final CSRC approval on 3 July 2026 (ai2.work, citing press reports).
  • The Next Web reported revenue more than quadrupled year on year in 2025, and that first-quarter 2026 net profit fell by close to half.
  • Reported 2025 humanoid shipments differ by source: about 5,200 to 5,500 units, versus the figure of roughly 13,000 for the whole industry used in this piece.
June 2026

Agility Robotics moved to go public through a SPAC

Agility announced on 24 June 2026 a merger with Churchill Capital Corp XI at about $2.5B pre-money, expected to bring more than $620M in gross proceeds and to trade on Nasdaq as AGLT, with closing expected by the end of 2026. Source: ai2.work summary of company announcement, Jun 2026.

May 2026

Tesla began converting Fremont toward Optimus

Tesla ended Model S and X production at Fremont in May 2026 and began converting the line for Optimus V3, with a stated goal of 1 million units a year. The same report quotes analysts expecting 2026 output in the low thousands, and a January 2026 remark from Musk that deployed units are mainly for learning, not productive tasks. Source: ai2.work, 2026.

March 2026

China's volume lead is widening beyond Unitree

Zhiyuan (AgiBot) reached cumulative mass production of 10,000 units in March 2026 and sold more than 5,000 units in 2025, roughly matching Unitree, per 36Kr (2026). The same report puts the top five Chinese makers at close to 60% of that market.

Not refreshed: Figure AI valuation ($39B, September 2025; no verified newer round found), total 2025 industry shipments (secondary sources conflict, one cites about 18,000), Tesla's actual Optimus output, bill-of-materials shares and component origin shares, and the Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley forecasts.

Test yourself

Unitree's IPO was priced near CNY 61B in value and closed day one at CNY 341.7B. Roughly how many times its pricing valuation was that?

Which statement about 2025 humanoid shipments does the chapter support?

01

Why Now

What actually changed

A humanoid robot is a bet that the cheapest way to automate a world built for humans is to build a machine shaped like one. Not because the human form is optimal, but because our factories, homes and tools already assume it.

Humanoids failed for 50 years because they were blind, clumsy and priceless. In the 2020s, all three changed at once. AI gave them sight and judgement; the EV boom gave them cheap motors and batteries.

The three unlocks

Why 2025, not 2005

  • AI brains: vision-language-action models let robots perceive and plan, not just repeat scripts.
  • Cheap actuators: the EV and drone booms drove down the cost of motors, batteries and sensors.
  • Data and simulation: robots now learn in simulation and from video, millions of virtual reps.
Then versus now

Why previous attempts failed

The old wayThe new way
Controlhand-coded for each taskAI learns general skills
Cost$1M+ research machinesheading for ~$20-30k
Sensesbrittle, pre-programmedcameras + learned perception
Resultimpressive demos, no productpilots in real factories
The arc

From lab novelty to factory floor

  1. ASIMO: Honda's walking demo
  2. Atlas: Boston Dynamics' athletic robot
  3. Optimus: Tesla enters, promising scale
  4. Figure + BMW: first real factory pilots
  5. China scales: Unitree ships thousands, cheaply
  6. Unitree lists in Shanghai (Aug); Agility announces SPAC merger

~10x cheaper: the cost of a capable humanoid, in a decade

From million-dollar research platforms to Chinese models selling for under $15,000 today, and Tesla targeting $20-30k at volume. Cost, not capability, is now the swing variable.

Test yourself

Why did humanoids fail for decades but start reaching factory pilots in the 2020s?

What does the timeline say is the main shift since Tesla's 2022 announcement?

02

How They Work

Brain, body and the loop between

The loop

How a humanoid turns a goal into an action

  1. Perceive: cameras and sensors build a live 3-D model of the world.
  2. Plan: an AI model decides what to do, step by step.
  3. Act: dozens of actuators move joints to execute the motion.
  4. Adjust: feedback corrects in real time (balance, grip, force).
The stack

A humanoid is a stack of hard problems

  • 05 AI model: the 'brain', perception, reasoning, action.
  • 04 Software & control: real-time balance, motion and safety.
  • 03 Sensors: cameras, force, touch, position.
  • 02 Actuators: the motors and joints, ~55% of the cost.
  • 01 Battery & frame: power and structure for a full shift.
The anatomy

What's inside a humanoid

~40Degrees of freedomindependent joints to control
~28Actuatorsmotors that drive the joints
5+ hrsBattery lifetarget for a useful shift
~70kgWeightroughly human-scale

Source: Company specifications (representative).

27 degrees of freedom in a single human hand

Replicating that dexterity, to fold laundry, seat a connector, handle a strawberry without crushing it, is the hardest problem in robotics. It is why the 'hands' remain the least solved, most valuable part of the machine.

Autonomy

Most 'robot' demos are more human than they look

  1. Puppet: a human wears a rig (teleoperated end)
  2. Scripted: pre-programmed motions
  3. Assisted: human supervises
  4. Task-autonomous: handles one job alone
  5. General: figures it out itself (fully autonomous end)
The hard problems

What still stands in the way

  • Hands: human-level dexterity (grasping a cable, a berry) is unsolved.
  • Battery: a full 8-hour shift on one charge is still hard.
  • Autonomy: reliable, unsupervised behaviour in messy environments.
  • Safety: a 70 kg machine working next to people must never fail dangerously.
  • Cost: every dollar of bill-of-materials decides the business case.
  • Reliability: industrial uptime, years not demos.

Test yourself

You see a viral video of a humanoid folding laundry smoothly. What does the chapter suggest you ask first?

A humanoid has about 28 actuators. Why does that matter most for its business?

03

The Economics

Does the math work?

The prize

Forecasts range from big to staggering

Humanoids in service (log scale) robots
View the data
Morgan Stanley forecast
202520000
203513000000
2040100000000
2050930000000

Source: Goldman Sachs; Morgan Stanley (2024-25); log scale · values read from the chart, approximate

The cost

The body, not the brain, is where the money goes

Share of humanoid cost %
View the data
Share of cost
Actuators (motors, joints)55
Sensors & vision15
Compute & battery14
Frame & assembly9
Hands / dexterity7

Source: Industry teardowns; SemiAnalysis (2025)

The business case

A robot only sells if it beats a wage

The robotThe worker
Upfront / wage~$20-50k to buy$15-40+ per hour
Runsup to 20 hrs/day8 hrs/day, breaks
Cost/hrfalls toward ~$1-3fully-loaded, rising
OtherNo salary, benefits, turnoverYes: judgement, dexterity, flexibility
The math

Why the cost curve decides everything

~$3/hrRobot, at scaleamortized over its working life
$15-40/hrHuman wagefully loaded, and rising
~20 hrsRobot workdayno breaks, no shifts, no turnover
~1-2 yrsPaybackat target cost, for simple tasks

Source: Illustrative unit economics.

The trajectory

Cost per robot is falling fast

Cost per humanoid robot USD
View the data
Cost per robot
2023150000
2024100000
202570000
2027e40000
2030e25000

Source: Company targets; industry estimates · values read from the chart, approximate

$5 trillion: Morgan Stanley's 2050 market estimate, including services

That figure assumes ~930 million robots in service and treats humanoids as a new labour force. Treat it as a scenario, not a forecast, but it explains why the capital is arriving now.

Test yourself

A robot's cost falls to about $3 per hour while a worker costs $15-40 per hour for a simple task. What does the chapter expect?

Using the cost share chart, roughly what share of a humanoid's cost is actuators plus hands?

04

The Players

Who is building it

The field

Well-funded, and split East-West

  • Tesla (Optimus): aiming for mass scale and low cost; ended Model S and X production at Fremont in May 2026 to convert the line toward Optimus V3 (1M/yr is the stated goal).
  • Figure AI: $39B valuation; BMW and Amazon pilots; industrial-first.
  • Unitree: China's cost leader, full humanoids under $15k, thousands shipped; listed on Shanghai's STAR Market in August 2026.
  • Boston Dynamics: the athletic pioneer, owned by Hyundai, now going commercial.
  • Agility (Digit): warehouse-focused; among the first in real logistics work; announced a SPAC merger with Churchill Capital Corp XI in June 2026 (about $2.5B pre-money).
  • 1X, Apptronik, others: a crowded field of well-capitalised challengers.
The money

A field awash in capital

$39BFigure valuation2025 Series C round
1M/yrTesla capacityplanned at Fremont
26%Unitree shareof humanoid units shipped
$1.9BFigure raisedto date

Source: Company disclosures (2025).

East versus West

The two models, in one comparison

Tesla OptimusUnitree G1
Price$20-30k (target)~$13,500 (today)
Build cost~$50-100k now~$9,000
Strategyvertically integrated, scalecheap, iterate fast
EdgeAI + brand + capitalsupply chain + cost
Made inUSA (with Chinese parts)China, end to end
Positioning

AI capability versus manufacturing muscle

A two-by-two of AI / autonomy (vertical) against manufacturing / cost (horizontal). Figure and Tesla sit high on AI, with Tesla further toward manufacturing. Boston Dynamics and Agility sit in the middle on AI, Unitree is strong on manufacturing with middling AI, and Chinese OEMs sit lowest on AI but strong on manufacturing.

Source: Analysis (qualitative positioning).

Test yourself

According to the comparison, how does Unitree G1's build cost compare with Tesla Optimus's?

What does the empty top-right of the positioning chart mean?

05

The China Problem

A familiar playbook

China doesn't just want to build robots, it already builds the parts everyone else needs to build them.

Motors, reducers, sensors, batteries: the humanoid supply chain runs through the Yangtze delta.

The chokepoint

China controls most humanoid components

Share of humanoid components by origin %
View the data
Share
China63
Japan15
US / Europe14
Others8

Source: SemiAnalysis; industry estimates (2025)

One-tenth the cost: Unitree builds a humanoid for ~$9,000

Roughly a tenth of Tesla Optimus's estimated ~$100,000 build cost, because Unitree makes its own motors, reducers and sensors, all within a two-hour logistics radius. Vertical integration, mastered.

The playbook

We have seen this movie before

  • Solar panels. China went from nowhere to ~80% of global production.
  • EV batteries. China now dominates cells, materials and refining.
  • Drones. One Chinese firm, DJI, took the world market.
  • Now: humanoids. Same tools: scale, vertical integration, state backing.
Who wins?

The two theories of the case

The West winsChina wins
Moat / costAI moat: the brain is the hard, defensible partCost: 70% cheaper bodies, today
Trust / volumeBrand & trust: buyers want reliabilityVolume: already shipping at scale
Industrial baseReshoring: subsidies rebuild capacitySupply chain: owns the critical parts
EconomicsSoftware margins: value moves up the stackSpeed: iterates faster, cheaper

Test yourself

Why can Unitree build a humanoid for about a tenth of Optimus's estimated cost?

If China makes about 63% of components, what is a Western builder's likely problem?

06

Reality Check

Hype versus reality

Both sides, fairly

What humanoids will and won't do soon

The hypeThe reality
Home'In your home by 2027'. Unstructured homes are hardestFactories first. Structured, repetitive tasks
Labour'Replaces all labour'. Dexterity is far from solvedTask-by-task. One narrow job at a time
Autonomy'Fully autonomous'. Most demos are supervisedHuman-in-loop. For years to come
Cost'Cheap now'. Cheap in China; costly elsewhereCost-driven. Adoption follows the price curve
The risk register

Six risks a serious investor tracks

  • Cost stalls: if actuator prices don't keep falling, the business case breaks.
  • Autonomy plateaus: dexterity and reliability may prove stubbornly hard.
  • China dependence: supply-chain leverage becomes a strategic weapon.
  • Overcapitalisation: too much money chasing too few real deployments.
  • Safety incident: one serious accident could set trust back years.
  • Labour backlash: displacement politics could gate deployment.

The first million humanoids will work in warehouses and factories, not homes, doing the dull, structured tasks people don't want.

Your house, with its chaos and stakes, is the last place a robot will be trusted.

The realistic timeline

How this likely unfolds

  1. pilots and early deployments in factories and warehouses.
  2. cost crosses wage parity for simple tasks; volumes scale.
  3. broader commercial use: retail, logistics, some services.
  4. the home, if dexterity and safety are truly solved.

Test yourself

Which deployment order does the chapter describe as most realistic?

Which signal does the chapter say decides the timeline more than any demo?

07

What to Watch

Signposts, not predictions

The dashboard

Four dials worth watching

$/robotUnit costthe whole game
Autonomy% unsuperviseddemo vs product
DeploymentsReal hours workedpilots turning into fleets
China shareSupply chainthe strategic risk
Key takeaways

Five signposts for the next 24 months

  1. Does cost keep falling? Wage parity for simple tasks is the inflection.
  2. Does autonomy improve? Watch unsupervised hours, not scripted demos.
  3. Do pilots become fleets? BMW, Amazon and others scaling up, or not.
  4. Can the West localise the body? Or does China own the supply chain?
  5. Who solves hands? Dexterity is the gate to most valuable work.

Test yourself

A company posts an acrobatic robot video. Which of these is the better evidence of progress?

Why is 'who solves hands?' a signpost?

08

Reference

Glossary and sources

Reference

Plain-language glossary

  • Actuator: a motor-and-joint unit that moves a robot's limb.
  • Degrees of freedom: the number of independent joints a robot can move.
  • End effector: the 'hand' or tool at the end of a robot arm.
  • Teleoperation: a human remotely controlling the robot.
  • Autonomy: the robot acting without human control.
  • VLA model: vision-language-action AI, the robot's 'brain'.
  • Bill of materials: the total parts cost to build one robot.
  • Sim-to-real: training in simulation, then deploying to hardware.

The West is teaching robots to think while China is learning to build their bodies for a tenth of the cost. Whoever bridges that gap first won't just win a market, they'll own a new kind of labour.

Key takeaways

The five conclusions to take away

  1. A body problem, not a brain problem: AI is nearly there; hardware isn't.
  2. Actuators are the moat: the motors are most of the cost, and the risk.
  3. China owns the supply chain: the EV/solar/drone playbook, run again.
  4. Cost decides the timeline: wage parity, task by task, not hype.
  5. Factories first, homes last: structured work years before your kitchen.
Reference

Sources & further reading

  • Goldman Sachs Research: 'The global market for robots could reach $38 billion by 2035' (2024).
  • Morgan Stanley: Humanoid robot market outlook to 2050 (2024-25).
  • SemiAnalysis: 'China's Unitree will dominate global robotics' (2025).
  • McKinsey: humanoid supply-chain analysis (2025).
  • Company disclosures: Tesla (Optimus), Figure AI, Unitree, Agility, Boston Dynamics.
  • Industry teardowns: humanoid bill-of-materials and cost estimates (2025).
  • Figures marked 'estimate', 'target' or 'illustrative' are compilations; forecasts vary widely.

Test yourself

What does 'end effector' refer to?

Which pair best summarises the piece's first two conclusions?

Sources cited

Goldman Sachs · Morgan Stanley · SemiAnalysis · McKinsey · Company disclosures · Industry teardowns · Company specifications · Yicai Global, Aug 2026 · The Next Web, Aug 2026 · 36Kr, 2026 · ai2.work, 2026 (Agility, Tesla, Unitree filings summary)

Keep reading

Research, not investment advice. Figures as of , from the sources cited.

Legal information and disclosures

These are my own views as of the update shown on this page. They can change without notice, and I have no duty to update them. Past performance does not indicate future results, and any investment can lose money.

This is for education only. It is not investment, legal, tax, medical or accounting advice, and it is not an offer to sell or a solicitation to buy any security in any jurisdiction. It does not consider your goals or circumstances.

Figures from company filings, public agencies and other third parties are believed to be reliable, but I have not independently verified them and cannot guarantee them. Forecasts and anything marked as an estimate rest on assumptions that may prove wrong.

Please do not copy or republish this material without my written consent.